Examines the tension between Raxxla as an intentionally undiscoverable developer background concept versus a hidden in-game location. Frontier's deliberate design choices and evasiveness about Raxxla definition suggests it may exist primarily as narrative lore rather than accessible gameplay content.
Original theorist: Scytale -- View original post
David Braben's statement 'you don't know what it is' indicates Raxxla definition differs from Rob Holdstock's novel concept. Original 'tiny part obvious' clue no longer relevant. Search methodology fundamentally unclear with no promised clues.
So, confirmed we have a NPC "Cmdr Rob Holdstock" and a real player "Cmdr Holdstock" ingame. What else ?[haha] Well.. as " we don't know what it is, though", seems that Raxxla is no longer " a planet with a portal which leads to.." nor a "certain celestial body"... Typical FD inconsistencies... We are looking for something we don't know "what" nor "where" it is and "the tiny part a little bit obvious" seems no longer to be relevant. And "there will be no clues". Seems the "Raxxla concept" has "evolved" since the original novel and 2.4 (and MB exit). For better?
David Braben's statement that Raxxla is 'not a great big eye floating in the sky' suggests ED's version diverges from Rafe Holdstock's mythical Raxxla with interdimensional gateway from The Dark Wheel novella.
Well, yes. Because it seems DB is aware of the fact that part of the player community is actively looking for Raxxla. He just gave us a clue or "no-clue" in the kind of "you are on the wrong way if you think ED Raxxla is RH's Raxxla". Click to expand... Does that mean it is not a great big eye floating in the sky? Isn’t that a clue? I thought we weren’t going to get any clues?
Salomé revealed the year 2814 as the time of Raxxla's discovery according to lore, though Drew Wagar confirmed receiving no additional information from developers about Raxxla.
I don’t think there is much to find in the lore about Raxxla. Several of the authority have confirmed that they know nothing about it. We have the description in TDW(which is considered a ledgend, not lore) and we have the missions listed in OP. The year 2814 was leaked by Salomé as the time of discovery, but I don’t think Drew got any more info at all.
Braben's comment to Ed Lewis interpreted as agreement about unpredictable livestream questions rather than hint about Raxxla's nature. CEO appears deliberately evasive about Raxxla details.
I wanted to address the comment from David Braben about "But you don't know what it is" concerning Raxxla. A lot of people seem to be attributing it to the fact that Raxxla is not a planet and that we don't even know what we are looking for and that the CEO of FDev has hinted that we don't even know what Raxxla is. I have a different take on it. He's responding to Ed's comment. It goes something like this: Someone in chat asks if Raxxla exists. Braben laughs and says it is a silly question and that, of course, it exists. And that's the end of his answer. Ed then goes on to say that he "actually, probably" could have predicted the four questions that were going to come up on the stream to which Braben responds, "Yeah, but you don't know what it is, though." to which Ed responds "It's true, ...
David Braben confirmed Raxxla exists in-game and is special ('what it is' rather than 'where it is'), suggesting it's not a run-of-the-mill celestial body but something with unique properties or significance.
I did watch the DBOBE chat and agree that when a question comes up about the existence of Raxxla in-game he says “silly question, yes of course”, then Ed says something like he could have forecast the four most popular questions in advance (i.e. Raxxla topic is at least one of them) and DB responds “yes, but you don’t know what it is”. So, nothing much there, and confirmed Ed is unaware of the details of Raxxla (as expected, probably a close secret within FD) except “what it is” rather than “where it is”. So I interpret that as meaning it is not just a run-of-the-mill planet, but something special (as we would expect). of course that won’t stop some people being disappointed when it is found. As we saw with the FRift storyline, expectations can run much larger than the solution, that’s h...
David Braben's statement about not knowing what Raxxla is may refer to players not knowing what form Raxxla takes, rather than it being non-existent or unlocatable.
I wanted to address the comment from David Braben about "But you don't know what it is" concerning Raxxla. A lot of people seem to be attributing it to the fact that Raxxla is not a planet and that we don't even know what we are looking for and that the CEO of FDev has hinted that we don't even know what Raxxla is. I have a different take on it. He's responding to Ed's comment. It goes something like this: Someone in chat asks if Raxxla exists. Braben laughs and says it is a silly question and that, of course, it exists. And that's the end of his answer. Ed then goes on to say that he "actually, probably" could have predicted the four questions that were going to come up on the stream to which Braben responds, "Yeah, but you don't know what it is, though." to which Ed responds "It's true, ...
Confirmation that Raxxla was not in original Elite due to procedural generation incompatibility with the name, supported by extensive code analysis.
I've had this idea on the backburner for a while now because I assume it's already been suggested, and because I'm not familiar with the 1984 Elite at all, but is it possible that Raxxla is hidden in the 1984 Elite that's free in the Frontier online store? Or, at least hints in that version of Elite that could help us find Raxxla in Elite: Dangerous? I never explicitly recall reading that Raxxla is in Elite: Dangerous specifically, just that it exists and only a select few know where it is. Thoughts? Opinions? Has this route been explored before? Click to expand... I understand this has already been disproved on the basis that Raxxla was not actually in the original Elite ; apparently the name is incompatible with the procedural coding mechanism they used, and the code was extensively a...
Hypothesis that Raxxla may be insignificant easter egg content or added in future patches rather than existing fully-formed in current game, given development cost implications.
RIP Guru, it seems the fruitless results of his efforts have broken his psyche completely. you confused the hell out of us the whole time. As far as the main topic goes; someone said something in a twitch stream that really made me think the other day. The idea that Frontier paid developers upwards of hundreds of thousands to work on content people might never see is absolutely bonkers. It is more than likely that Raxxla will be added as some sort of future content, or it's something so small and unfinished that it wouldn't really be a huge deal to actually find it. At first I disagreed, because Raxxla was a big mystery in the original Elite back when the game was tiny and barely had anything, but I think that's just what it was. A whisper. A mention. An idea that isn't even fully formed...
Theory that the critical question about Raxxla is whether it's interactable; if metaphorical ('It's a journey'), it wouldn't classify as an interactable object.
I think the more correct question to ask DB is "Is Raxxla interactable?" Because if it really is this whole "It's inside all of us" or "It's a journey, called 'Raxxla'" then that more metaphorical and wishy washy stuff wouldn't be classified as interactable
// no fact checks linked yet
Log in to comment