If Raxxla is discoverable as a named planet, it would require special arrangement with the Planetary Federation for display in the Navcom. This protocol prevents casual discovery while allowing earned access.
Original theorist: Louis Calvert -- View original post
If Raxxla is discoverable by planet name, it would require an arrangement with the Planetary Federation for the planet to display as 'Raxxla' in the Navcom. The visible naming would defeat the purpose of concealment.
In fairness, for it to be possible to do via finding a planet called Raxxla, then it would have to be known as such to UC / the PF / your ships Navcom. Which would kind of need the folks on Raxxla to have an arrangement in place with UC, etc. that the big flashing 'this is Raxxla' sign pops up if you scan the planet. Which would be a kind of odd thing for them to do. Click to expand... { "lightbox_close": "Close", "lightbox_next": "Next", "lightbox_previous": "Previous", "lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.", "lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow", "lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow", "lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen", "lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails", "lightbox_download": "Download", "lightbox_share": "Shar...
// no fact checks linked yet
Log in to comment